datafloe · Managed Postgres dataset
Neon vs Supabase: the price flips with your duty cycle
Neon vs Supabase on real managed-Postgres pricing across four workloads. Neon's scale-to-zero wins when idle or bursty; Supabase's flat compute wins always-on — and at the HA line one of them is disqualified. Itemized, sourced, updated.
Cost comparison · 17 providers · us-east list, itemized · snapshot 2026-10-18 · open under CC-BY-4.0 · provenance record →
The numbers
Neon vs Supabase, by workload
Each provider's cost renormalized to the same workload — that's the only way the totals compare. Cheapest per row is highlighted; a provider that fails the workload's required capabilities is struck through, never marked cheapest.
| Workload | Neon | Supabase | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hobby / spiky dev 1 GB · 13% duty | $0 | $25 | Neon |
| Steady small SaaS 20 GB · 100% duty | $160 | $127 | Supabase by 26% |
| Bursty app 50 GB · 25% duty | $94 | $230 | Neon by 145% |
| Production HA 100 GB · 100% duty · HA | $674 | $459 excluded: no automatic failover; PITR add-on only; HIPAA not at list price | Neon other excluded |
Catch: in Production HA, Supabase is cheaper on paper but excluded (no automatic failover; PITR add-on only; HIPAA not at list price) — so Neon actually wins the row.
Verdict: Neon is cheaper right up until you run the database full-time — then Supabase wins, until you need real HA, where Supabase drops out. The two never trade blows on the same axis, so a flat “which is cheaper” has no answer. The duty cycle decides it.
The flip nobody quotes
Neon bills serverless — compute-time plus storage — and scales to zero when idle. Supabase is a flat plan with a compute add-on: a fixed floor whether you serve one request or a million. That single structural difference is the whole comparison.
A small side project fits inside Neon’s free plan. Supabase also has a free plan, but it caps the database at 500 MB and pauses projects after a week without activity, so a 1 GB project needs the $25 Pro plan. Push a small database to always-on (steady 24/7, modest size) and it inverts: Neon’s metered compute now runs around the clock and overshoots Supabase’s fixed plan by about a quarter. The crossover is duty cycle, not size — Supabase wins the moment you stop scaling to zero.
Bump the workload up but keep it bursty — bigger, but only busy part of the day — and it flips back to Neon: scale-to-zero reclaims the idle hours Supabase still charges for.
The catch at the HA line
At the production-HA workload Supabase shows the lower sticker — and it doesn’t count. Supabase offers point-in-time recovery only as a paid add-on and HIPAA only on its Team plan, so for a workload that requires both it doesn’t clear the bar and is marked disqualified in the dataset. Neon qualifies, but only on its Scale plan, the one that offers a BAA, at roughly double its usual compute rate. Its HA costs nothing extra because it keeps no standby: if a zone fails, the database restarts elsewhere, which Neon says takes one to ten minutes. The lower Supabase number is a price for a database the workload isn’t allowed to use.
So, which one
- Prototyping, side projects, anything that idles: Neon, decisively — a small idle database can run on the free plan.
- A small app that’s genuinely on 24/7: Supabase — the flat plan beats Neon’s metered clock at low size.
- Bursty production (spiky but real): Neon — scale-to-zero pays for the quiet hours.
- Regulated or HA-required production: Neon, if it’s one of these two — Supabase’s add-on PITR, Team-only HIPAA and lack of automatic failover on Pro disqualify it. Across the whole field, though, Cloud SQL and RDS are cheaper here.
One more thing the price can’t show: Supabase ships auth, realtime, and storage in that plan; Neon is Postgres and nothing else. If you’d otherwise buy those separately, Supabase’s “expensive” steady-state number is buying more than a database.
Embed this
Put the live digest on your page.
The open (CC BY 4.0) snapshot, glanceable — as an interactive iframe, a paste-anywhere image, or a one-line script. Attribution links back here and is required by the license.
Powered by the datafloe Managed Postgres dataset
Every number here comes from a live, licensed dataset.
17 providers, itemized (compute + storage + HA), anchor-tested against each vendor's published price, with a full provenance record on file. The snapshot is open under CC-BY-4.0 · compiled 2026-10-18.
The API call that returns this data
curl https://api.datafloe.dev/v1/datafloe/managed-postgres/sample Keyless, open under CC-BY-4.0 — reuse with attribution. The full itemized rows, price history, and the maintained feed are the commercial dataset.