datafloe Get a key

datafloe · Managed Postgres dataset

Neon vs Supabase: the price flips with your duty cycle

Neon vs Supabase on real managed-Postgres pricing across four workloads. Neon's scale-to-zero wins when idle or bursty; Supabase's flat compute wins always-on — and at the HA line one of them is disqualified. Itemized, sourced, updated.

Cost comparison · 11 providers · us-east list, itemized · snapshot 2026-07-20 · open under CC-BY-4.0 · provenance record →

The numbers

Neon vs Supabase, by workload

Each provider's cost renormalized to the same workload — that's the only way the totals compare. Cheapest per row is highlighted; a provider that fails the workload's required capabilities is struck through, never marked cheapest.

$/mo · itemized
Workload Neon Supabase Cheaper
Hobby / spiky dev 1 GB · 13% duty $0.18 $25 Neon by 13789%
Steady small SaaS 20 GB · 100% duty $194 $95 Supabase by 106%
Bursty app 50 GB · 25% duty $104 $210 Neon by 102%
Production HA 100 GB · 100% duty · HA $424 $421 excluded: PITR add-on only Neon

Catch: in Production HA, Supabase is cheaper on paper but excluded (PITR add-on only) — so Neon actually wins the row.

Verdict: Neon is cheaper right up until you run the database full-time — then Supabase wins, until you need real HA, where Supabase drops out. The two never trade blows on the same axis, so a flat “which is cheaper” has no answer. The duty cycle decides it.

The flip nobody quotes

Neon bills serverless — compute-time plus storage — and scales to zero when idle. Supabase is a flat plan with a compute add-on: a fixed floor whether you serve one request or a million. That single structural difference is the whole comparison.

Idle or spiky, Neon’s floor is essentially the storage bill and Supabase is paying for a server that’s mostly asleep — so on the hobby workload Neon is cents against Supabase’s flat plan. Push the same small database to always-on (steady 24/7, modest size) and it inverts: Neon’s metered compute now runs around the clock and overshoots Supabase’s fixed plan by roughly 2×. The crossover is duty cycle, not size — Supabase wins the moment you stop scaling to zero.

Bump the workload up but keep it bursty — bigger, but only busy part of the day — and it flips back to Neon: scale-to-zero reclaims the idle hours Supabase still charges for.

The catch at the HA line

At the production-HA workload the two totals land within a few dollars of each other — which reads like a coin toss and isn’t. Supabase offers point-in-time recovery only as a paid add-on, so for a workload that requires PITR it doesn’t clear the bar and is marked disqualified in the dataset. Neon includes it, and because its storage is decoupled from compute, adding a high-availability standby duplicates no storage and the standby itself scales to zero — so HA costs Neon almost nothing. The near-tie on price is really Neon qualifying and Supabase not.

So, which one

  • Prototyping, side projects, anything that idles: Neon, decisively — you pay for storage and little else.
  • A small app that’s genuinely on 24/7: Supabase — the flat plan beats Neon’s metered clock at low size.
  • Bursty production (spiky but real): Neon — scale-to-zero pays for the quiet hours.
  • Regulated or HA-required production: Neon — Supabase’s PITR-as-add-on disqualifies it here regardless of the sticker price.

One more thing the price can’t show: Supabase ships auth, realtime, and storage in that plan; Neon is Postgres and nothing else. If you’d otherwise buy those separately, Supabase’s “expensive” steady-state number is buying more than a database.

Embed this

Put the live digest on your page.

The open (CC BY 4.0) snapshot, glanceable — as an interactive iframe, a paste-anywhere image, or a one-line script. Attribution links back here and is required by the license.

/embed/managed-postgres
preview
snippet
 

Powered by the datafloe Managed Postgres dataset

Every number here comes from a live, licensed dataset.

11 providers, itemized (compute + storage + HA), anchor-tested against each vendor's published price, with a full provenance record on file. The snapshot is open under CC-BY-4.0 · compiled 2026-07-20.

The API call that returns this data
curl https://api.datafloe.dev/v1/datafloe/managed-postgres/sample

Keyless, open under CC-BY-4.0 — reuse with attribution. The full itemized rows, price history, and the maintained feed are the commercial dataset.